scientific diffusion Seminars and Agenda The discovery of Perieral Living: Articulations of the Popular in São Paulo Architecture (1960-1980)
The discovery of Perieral Living: Articulations of the Popular in São Paulo Architecture (1960-1980)
The professor of the Getúlio Vargas Foundation (CPDOC-FGV), José Henrique Bortoluci, presents the seminar, “The Discovery of Peripheral Living: Articulations of the Popular in São Paulo Architecture (1960-1980).” The article about this work was published in the journal Novos Estudos CEBRAP and can be accessed at this link. The event is part of the series of special seminars hosted by the Center for Metropolitan Studies, one of the RIDCs (Research, Innovation and Dissemination Centers) financed by FAPESP.
ABSTRACT: The research addresses the relationships between architects and the questions of “the people” and “social housing” as discursive constructions and urban realities in São Paulo, from the 1960s until the 1980s. In the 1970s, in the midst of a crisis of initial attempts to situate the problem of low-income housing at the center of architects’ agendas within the political left, the relationship between progressive architects and poor peripheral populations goes through an initial paradigmatic turn.
POST-EVENT
The professor of the Getúlio Vargas Foundation (CPDOC-FGV), José Henrique Bortoluci, presented the seminar, “The Discovery of Peripheral Living: Articulations of the Popular in São Paulo Architecture (1960-1980).” The article about this work was published in the journal Novos Estudos CEBRAP and can be accessed at this link. The event is part of the series of special seminars hosted by the Center for Metropolitan Studies, one of the RIDCs (Research, Innovation and Dissemination Centers) financed by FAPESP.
ABSTRACT: The research addresses the relationships between architects and the questions of “the people” and “social housing” as discursive constructions and urban realities in São Paulo, from the 1960s until the 1980s. In the 1970s, in the midst of a crisis of initial attempts to situate the problem of low-income housing at the center of architects’ agendas within the political left, the relationship between progressive architects and poor peripheral populations goes through an initial paradigmatic turn.
